[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130102175610.GA25274@fieldses.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 12:56:10 -0500
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Sage Weil <sage@...tank.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph updates for 3.8
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:59:55AM -0800, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2012, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 01:29:49PM -0800, Sage Weil wrote:
> > > Hi Linus,
> > >
> > > Please pull the following Ceph updates for 3.8 from
> > >
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sage/ceph-client.git for-linus
> > >
> > > There's a trivial conflict in net/ceph/osd_client.c dealing with rbtree
> > > node initialization; the resolution is to keep the RB_CLEAR_NODE() call
> > > (see 4c199a93 for the conflicting commit).
> > >
> > > There are a few different groups of commits here. The largest is Alex's
> > > ongoing work to enable the coming RBD features (cloning, striping).
> > > There is some cleanup in libceph that goes along with it. Cyril and David
> > > have fixed some problems with NFS reexport (leaking dentries and page
> > > locks),
> >
> > Just out of curiosity--what's the state of NFS exports now?
> >
> > I seem to recall initially it was sort-of supported by filehandle
> > lookups didn't really work reliably?
>
> That hasn't changed yet... if you miss both the client and MDS caches you
> get ESTALE. The MDS cache is big, so this works okay for casual use, but
> it's not great. This should be fixed on the server side of things for the
> next major release (cuttlefish). The client code shouldn't need to
> change.
OK, thanks for the update.
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists