[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1357153416.21409.17488.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 11:03:36 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andreas Voellmy <andreas.voellmy@...e.edu>,
"Junchang(Jason) Wang" <junchang.wang@...e.edu>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] epoll: prevent missed events on EPOLL_CTL_MOD
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 18:40 +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> > First, thanks for working on this issue.
>
> No problem!
>
> > It seems the real problem is the epi->event.events = event->events;
> > which is done without taking ep->lock
>
> Yes. I am hoping it is possible to do it without a lock there,
> but your change is more obviously correct.
>
> > While a smp_mb() could reduce the race window, I believe there is still
> > a race, and the following patch would close it.
>
> I'm not an experienced kernel hacker, can you describe where the race
> would be?
It would be for example in ep_send_events_proc() doing :
if (epi->event.events & EPOLLONESHOT)
epi->event.events &= EP_PRIVATE_BITS;
And this could happen at the same time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists