[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1357164511.21409.18486.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:08:31 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@...il.com>
To: Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andreas Voellmy <andreas.voellmy@...e.edu>,
"Junchang(Jason) Wang" <junchang.wang@...e.edu>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] epoll: prevent missed events on EPOLL_CTL_MOD
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 19:32 +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> That modification in ep_send_events_proc() is protected by ep->mtx
> (as is ep_modify()), though. Maybe there are other places, but I
> don't see it.
Yes, and using a mutex for protecting this field while its read from
interrupt context (so without mutex synch help) is why there were races.
Some users rely on barriers included in spin_lock/spin_unlock, others in
explicit barriers, or before your patch pure luck.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists