[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKocOOMx4nLFXfbE95WxsJ7j3mFf_GPWxcmMxqHbMh8tBgULWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:58:10 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@...il.com>,
Antti Palosaari <crope@....fi>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Furniss <andyqos@...sn.org>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: radeon 0000:02:00.0: GPU lockup CP stall for more than 10000msec
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
> <markus@...ppelsdorf.de> wrote:
>> On 2013.01.02 at 17:31 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>> Please affected people can you test if patch :
>>> http://people.freedesktop.org/~glisse/0003-drm-radeon-fix-dma-copy-on-r6xx-r7xx-evergen-ni-si-g.patch
>>>
>>> Fix the issue, you need to make sure you don't have the patch that
>>> disable dma on r6xx ie that line 977-978 & 1061-1062 in radeon_asic.c
>>> is :
>>> .copy = &r600_copy_dma,
>>> .copy_ring_index = R600_RING_TYPE_DMA_INDEX,
>>
>> It fixes the issue for me. Thanks.
>
> The count is actually the count, not count - 1. The real fix seems to
> be that r6xx requires 2 dw aligned transfers. The attached patch
> fixes the issue for me.
>
Catching up with this thread. I reverted the
drm/radeon: use async dma for ttm buffer moves on 6xx-SI
commit id: 2d6cc7296d4ee128ab0fa3b715f0afde511f49c2
Do I need to apply this patch without reverting
2d6cc7296d4ee128ab0fa3b715f0afde511f49c2?
Thanks,
-- Shuah
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists