[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130102092854.GC2631@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 09:28:54 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>,
Tomasz Stanislawski <t.stanislaws@...sung.com>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 6/6] clk: s5p-g2d: Fix incorrect usage of
IS_ERR_OR_NULL
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 08:29:57AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> There are dereferences to the result of clk_get a few times. I tried the
> following semantic patch:
And those are buggy; struct clk is _SUPPOSED_ to be an OPAQUE COOKIE
and no one other than the clk code should be dereferencing it.
I guess this is the danger of the common clk API - we now have a struct
clk that is exposed in a linux/*.h include which anyone can include, and
now anyone can get a definition for a struct clk and dereference it,
destroying opaqueness of this cookie.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists