linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/11] xen: Initial kexec/kdump implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50E41973.9050705@citrix.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:26:43 +0000
From:	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC:	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
	<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"jbeulich@...e.com" <jbeulich@...e.com>,
	"maxim.uvarov@...cle.com" <maxim.uvarov@...cle.com>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	"vgoyal@...hat.com" <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/11] xen: Initial kexec/kdump implementation

On 27/12/12 18:02, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andrew Cooper<andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>  writes:
>
>> On 27/12/2012 07:53, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> The syscall ABI still has the wrong semantics.
>>>
>>> Aka totally unmaintainable and umergeable.
>>>
>>> The concept of domU support is also strange.  What does domU support even mean, when the dom0 support is loading a kernel to pick up Xen when Xen falls over.
>> There are two requirements pulling at this patch series, but I agree
>> that we need to clarify them.
> It probably make sense to split them apart a little even.
>
>

Thinking about this split, there might be a way to simply it even more.

/sbin/kexec can load the "Xen" crash kernel itself by issuing hypercalls 
using /dev/xen/privcmd.  This would remove the need for the dom0 kernel 
to distinguish between loading a crash kernel for itself and loading a 
kernel for Xen.

Or is this just a silly idea complicating the matter?

~Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/