lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 3 Jan 2013 02:46:01 -0800
From:	Michel Lespinasse <>
To:	Rik van Riel <>
	Jan Beulich <>,
	Thomas Gleixner <>,
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] x86,smp: make ticket spinlock proportional
 backoff w/ auto tuning

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Rik van Riel <> wrote:
> The v2 series integrates several ideas from Michel Lespinasse
> and Eric Dumazet, which should result in better throughput and
> nicer behaviour in situations with contention on multiple locks.
> Please let me know if you manage to break this code in any way,
> so I can fix it...

I'm seeing some very weird things on my 3 test machines. Looks like
the spinlock delay sometimes gets crazy, at which point spinlock
performance becomes unbearable and the network driver freaks out.

# ./spinlock_load_test
 1 spinlocks: 24159990
 2 spinlocks: 12900657
 3 spinlocks: 11547771
 4 spinlocks: 9113
 6 spinlocks: 259
 8 spinlocks: 310
12 spinlocks: 283
16 spinlocks:
<seems to be stuck here; meanwhile my serial console fills up with
network driver cries>

Well, I take it as an incitation to pay special attention to this code review :)

Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists