[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130103215642.b7f641ecc107fd65bdd5eefe@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 21:56:42 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the s390 tree
Hi Martin,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:31:55 +0100 Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
> I surprises me a bit that there is only one hunk in the cleanup patch.
> I expected three, the above for virtio_ccw.c, one for irq.c and another
> for irq.h. I checked the resulting tree which is correct! The merge diff
> has a '++' line for irq.c/irq.h:
Those bits were further down in the mail I sent you (after my signature).
Thanks for checking.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists