[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130103124242.GG7247@mwanda>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 15:42:42 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn
Cc: cjb@...top.org, sameo@...ux.intel.com, arnd@...db.de,
oakad@...oo.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bp@...en8.de, devel@...uxdriverproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] MFD:rtsx: Add callback function conv_clk_and_div_n
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:41:45AM +0800, wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rts5209.c b/drivers/mfd/rts5209.c
> index ba74de8..98fe0f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/rts5209.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rts5209.c
> @@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ static const struct pcr_ops rts5209_pcr_ops = {
> .card_power_off = rts5209_card_power_off,
> .switch_output_voltage = rts5209_switch_output_voltage,
> .cd_deglitch = NULL,
> + .conv_clk_and_div_n = NULL,
This isn't needed. It's set to NULL by default.
> - N = (u8)(clk - 2);
> + if (pcr->ops->conv_clk_and_div_n)
> + N = (u8)pcr->ops->conv_clk_and_div_n(clk, CLK_TO_DIV_N);
> + else
> + N = (u8)(clk - 2);
These unneeded casts are confusing. Why are we doing them anyway?
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists