linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 25/32] aio: use xchg() instead of completion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130103153414.23b0b913.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 3 Jan 2013 15:34:14 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-aio@...ck.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, zab@...hat.com, bcrl@...ck.org,
	jmoyer@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/32] aio: use xchg() instead of completion_lock

On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 18:00:04 -0800
Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com> wrote:

> So, for sticking kiocb completions on the kioctx ringbuffer, we need a
> lock - it unfortunately can't be lockless.
> 
> When the kioctx is shared between threads on different cpus and the rate
> of completions is high, this lock sees quite a bit of contention - in
> terms of cacheline contention it's the hottest thing in the aio
> subsystem.
> 
> That means, with a regular spinlock, we're going to take a cache miss
> to grab the lock, then another cache miss when we touch the data the
> lock protects - if it's on the same cacheline as the lock, other cpus
> spinning on the lock are going to be pulling it out from under us as
> we're using it.
> 
> So, we use an old trick to get rid of this second forced cache miss -
> make the data the lock protects be the lock itself, so we grab them both
> at once.

Boy I hope you got that right.

Did you consider using bit_spin_lock() on the upper bit of `tail'? 
We've done that in other places and we at least know that it works. 
And it has the optimisations for CONFIG_SMP=n, understands
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK, has arch-specific optimisations, etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/