[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130103.083848.1533296860718294309.hdoyu@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:38:48 +0100
From: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
To: "swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: tegra: Set SCU base address dynamically from DT
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote @ Wed, 2 Jan 2013 20:02:53 +0100:
> On 12/16/2012 11:18 PM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> > Set Snoop Control Unit(SCU) register base address dynamically from DT.
>
> Hiroshi, what's the status on this patch series? I think Rob had
> comments/objections on patch 4; are you going to post an updated series,
> or is this series replaced by patch 3 in your Tegra114 series?
As Rob suggested, at least, SCU base address should be detected in
common code, scu_of_init() even if DT /cpus is the primary way to
detect # of cores. I'll repost later.
This patch can be done independent of Tegra114 series.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists