linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 9/9] ARM: tegra: Add initial support for Tegra 114 SoC.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130104.091607.1562807518754570421.hdoyu@nvidia.com>
Date:	Fri, 4 Jan 2013 08:16:07 +0100
From:	Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
To:	"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"jason@...edaemon.net" <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	"swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	"johnstul@...ibm.com" <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
	"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"shawn.guo@...aro.org" <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	"plagnioj@...osoft.com" <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] ARM: tegra: Add initial support for Tegra 114 SoC.

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote @ Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:28:19 +0100:

> On Thursday 20 December 2012, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> > +
> > +DT_MACHINE_START(TEGRA114_DT, "NVIDIA Tegra114 (Flattened Device Tree)")
> > +       .smp            = smp_ops(tegra_smp_ops),
> > +       .map_io         = tegra_map_common_io,
> > +       .init_early     = tegra30_init_early,
> > +       .init_irq       = tegra_dt_init_irq,
> > +       .handle_irq     = gic_handle_irq,
> > +       .init_time      = clocksource_of_init,
> > +       .init_machine   = tegra114_dt_init,
> > +       .init_late      = tegra_init_late,
> > +       .restart        = tegra_assert_system_reset,
> > +       .dt_compat      = tegra114_dt_board_compat,
> > +MACHINE_END
> 
> This one is so similar to Tegra30 that I wonder if it's actually worth keeping
> them separate still. The only difference I see is the clock initialization.
> Maybe that can be factored out to keep this the same as Tegra30.
> 
> Or are you planning to add more SoC specific here that would make this harder?

That was the original plan, but I'll consider if your proposal works
or not once again. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/