linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/2] Mempressure cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 4 Jan 2013 00:27:52 -0800
From:	Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
	Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
	Leonid Moiseichuk <leonid.moiseichuk@...ia.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
	patches@...aro.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Mempressure cgroup

Hi all,

Here is another round of the mempressure cgroup. This time I dared to
remove the RFC tag. :)

In this revision:

- Addressed most of Kirill Shutemov's comments. I didn't bother
  implementing per-level lists, though. It would needlessly complicate the
  logic, and the gain would be only visible with lots of watchers (which
  we don't have for our use-cases). But it is always an option to add the
  feature;

- I've split the pach into two: 'shrinker' and 'levels' parts. While the
  full-fledged userland shrinker is an interesting idea, we don't have any
  users ready for it, so I won't advocate for it too much.

  And since at least Kirill has some concerns about it, I don't want the
  shrinker to block the pressure levels.

  So, these are now separate. At some point, I'd like to both of them
  merged, but if anything, let's discuss them separately;

- Rebased onto v3.8-rc2.

RFC v2 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/10/128):

 - Added documentation, describes APIs and the purpose;
 - Implemented shrinker interface, this is based on Andrew's idea and
   supersedes my "balance" level idea;
 - The shrinker interface comes with a stress-test utility, that is what
   Andrew was also asking for. A simple app that we can run and see if the
   thing works as expected;
 - Added reclaimer's target_mem_cgroup handling;
 - As promised, added support for multiple listeners, and fixed some other
   comments on the previous RFC.

RFC v1 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/28/109)

--
 Documentation/cgroups/mempressure.txt    |  97 +++++
 Documentation/cgroups/mempressure_test.c | 213 ++++++++++
 include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h            |   6 +
 include/linux/vmstat.h                   |  11 +
 init/Kconfig                             |  13 +
 mm/Makefile                              |   1 +
 mm/mempressure.c                         | 487 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/vmscan.c                              |   4 +
 8 files changed, 832 insertions(+)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/