[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUXeNFfAwugKZMuy2Arnt0UU2stX5FbuOc=P_B+Rg5oQAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 11:49:06 +0100
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ra.org>
Cc: alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: 3.8-rc2: EFI framebuffer lock inversion...
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ra.org> wrote:
> On 3 January 2013 22:11, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> just wanted to test the fb-fix [2] from Alan and followed the thread in [1].
>> Me is also working with i915 KMS.
>>
>> I looked at nouveau KMS driver and adapted the part for i915:
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c-200- /* remove conflicting
>> drivers (vesafb, efifb etc) */
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c:201: aper = alloc_apertures(3);
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c-202- if (!aper)
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c-203- return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> Untested by me, feel free to test.
>>
>> Maybe some of the i915 and/or fb driver experts can comment on the problem.
>
> The structure array from alloc_apertures is just used for the PCI base
> address registers, so it's important here.
>
> I'll take a look at the efifb locking later.
>
You had a chance to look at this?
- Sedat -
> Thanks,
> Daniel
> --
> Daniel J Blueman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists