linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Manage only online cpus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1908625.BmKqKVnVdj@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Fri, 04 Jan 2013 12:32:54 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, nicolas.pitre@...aro.org,
	amit.kucheria@...aro.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	pdsw-power-team@....com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Manage only online cpus

On Friday, January 04, 2013 10:44:36 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 3 January 2013 17:32, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > True, but have those bugs been introduced recently (ie. in v3.8-rc1 or later)?
> 
> Don't know... I feel they were always there, its just that nobody
> tested it that way :)

That exactly is my point. :-)

If they have always been there, I don't see much reason for hurrying with the
fixes, so I'll queue them up for v3.9.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/