linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: tegra30: Convert clk out to composite clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50E7027A.1090102@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Fri, 04 Jan 2013 09:25:30 -0700
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>
CC:	mturquette@...aro.org, swarren@...dia.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: tegra30: Convert clk out to composite clk

On 01/03/2013 10:51 PM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> Convert clk out to composite clock type which removes
> the mux clock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>
> ---
> This patch is rebased on ccf-rework for Tegra patch series. It is just to show
> how clk-composite can be used, not to be merged. If patch 1 is accepted then
> I would like to merge this patch to ccf-rework series.

Just so I'm clear, is the intent that patch 1 of this series gets
reviewed/accepted, and then you'll repost an updated version of the
Tegra CCF rework series that relies on patch 1? If so, patch 1 would
need to be either taken through the Tegra tree, or put into a separate
branch in the clock tree, so the Tegra tree can merge it as a dependency
of the Tegra CCF rework branch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/