[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQVM-Rd82n-qhasDCA0+-n6TWH6m9Vm6N1nER__5p34z-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 14:10:25 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7u1 26/31] x86: Don't enable swiotlb if there is not
enough ram for it
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com> wrote:
> Pani'cing the system doesn't sound like a good option to me in this
> case. This change to disable swiotlb is made for kdump. However, with
> this change several system fail to boot, unless crashkernel_low=72M is
> specified.
this patchset is new feature to put second kdump kernel above 4G.
>
> I would the say the right approach to solve this would be to not
> change the current pci_swiotlb_detect_override() behavior and treat
> swiotlb =1 upon entry equivalent to swiotlb_force set.
that will make intel system have to take crashkernel_low=72M too.
otherwise intel system will get panic during swiotlb allocation.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists