[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F1C9750EE@ORSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 22:22:09 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lance Ortiz <lance.ortiz@...com>
CC: "lance_ortiz@...mail.com" <lance_ortiz@...mail.com>,
"jiang.liu@...wei.com" <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"mchehab@...hat.com" <mchehab@...hat.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 3/3] aerdrv: Cleanup log output for AER
I sent a "please pull" to Ingo/Peter/Thomas about an hour ago ... if they
push back (or ignore) we can fold your ack and nit-picks into another
version.
> s/elimiating/eliminating/ above.
Ugh ... nobody spotted this one ("many eyes" really does work!)
> I remove the "v1-v2" notes when I merge patches because I don't think
> they're useful any more. But if Tony applies these, he can use his
> judgment.
Yes - I do too. In fact it is easier on the maintainer if this sort of meta-commentary
goes *after* the "---" in the patch. Then it is available for review (where it is
most helpful), but tools will automatically drop it when applying the patch.
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists