[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130104025105.GB2617@blaptop>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 11:51:05 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/8] Don't allow volatile attribute on THP and KSM
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 08:27:31AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 01/02/2013 08:28 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > VOLATILE imply the the pages in the range isn't working set any more
> > so it's pointless that make them to THP/KSM.
>
> One of the points of this implementation is that it be able to preserve
> memory contents when there is no pressure. If those contents happen to
> contain a THP/KSM page, and there's no pressure, it seems like the right
> thing to do is to leave that memory in place.
Indeed. I should have written more cleary,
Current implementation is following as
1. madvised-THP/KSM(1, 10) -> mvolatile(1, 10) -> fail
2. mvolatile(1, 10) -> madvised-THP/KSM(1, 10) -> fail
3. always-THP -> mvolatile -> success -> if memory pressure happens
-> split_huge_page -> discard.
I think 2,3 makes sense to me but we need to fix 1 in further patches.
>
> It might be a fair thing to do this in order to keep the implementation
> more sane at the moment. But, we should make sure there's some good
> text on that in the changelog.
Absolutely, Thanks for pointing out, Dave.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists