lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130104025105.GB2617@blaptop>
Date:	Fri, 4 Jan 2013 11:51:05 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/8] Don't allow volatile attribute on THP and KSM

On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 08:27:31AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 01/02/2013 08:28 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > VOLATILE imply the the pages in the range isn't working set any more
> > so it's pointless that make them to THP/KSM.
> 
> One of the points of this implementation is that it be able to preserve
> memory contents when there is no pressure.  If those contents happen to
> contain a THP/KSM page, and there's no pressure, it seems like the right
> thing to do is to leave that memory in place.

Indeed. I should have written more cleary,

Current implementation is following as

1. madvised-THP/KSM(1, 10) -> mvolatile(1, 10) -> fail
2. mvolatile(1, 10) -> madvised-THP/KSM(1, 10) -> fail
3. always-THP -> mvolatile -> success -> if memory pressure happens
   -> split_huge_page -> discard.

I think 2,3 makes sense to me but we need to fix 1 in further patches.

> 
> It might be a fair thing to do this in order to keep the implementation
> more sane at the moment.  But, we should make sure there's some good
> text on that in the changelog.

Absolutely, Thanks for pointing out, Dave.

> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ