linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] tracing: Verify target file before registering a uprobe event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87vcbdr2nq.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date:	Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:30:01 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@...il.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tracing: Verify target file before registering a uprobe event

Hi, Steve.

On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:50:38 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@...il.com>
>
> Without this patch, we can register a uprobe event for a directory.
> Enabling such a uprobe event would fail anyway .
>
> Example:
> $ echo 'p /bin:0x4245c0' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
>
> However dirctories cannot be valid targets for uprobe.
> Hence verify if the target is a regular file during the probe
> registration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c |    6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> index 03003cd..0815f25 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> @@ -257,6 +257,10 @@ static int create_trace_uprobe(int argc, char **argv)
>  		goto fail_address_parse;
>  
>  	inode = igrab(path.dentry->d_inode);
> +	 if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {

Doesn't !S_ISREG() include S_ISDIR() case too?

Anyway I can see an additional whitespace in front of the "if".

Thanks,
Namhyung


> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto fail_address_parse;
> +	}
>  
>  	argc -= 2;
>  	argv += 2;
> @@ -356,7 +360,7 @@ fail_address_parse:
>  	if (inode)
>  		iput(inode);
>  
> -	pr_info("Failed to parse address.\n");
> +	pr_info("Failed to parse address or file.\n");
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/