| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAFj3OHWBtu9-7SdVJnMnUytjL9i3i2xEfoB=y_zA_5HXir9o0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 18:52:12 +0800
From: Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@...il.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, gthelen@...gle.com,
fengguang.wu@...el.com, glommer@...allels.com,
Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@...bao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 6/8] memcg: Don't account root_mem_cgroup page statistics
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Wed 26-12-12 01:27:27, Sha Zhengju wrote:
>> From: Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@...bao.com>
>>
>> If memcg is enabled and no non-root memcg exists, all allocated pages
>> belongs to root_mem_cgroup and go through root memcg statistics routines
>> which brings some overheads. So for the sake of performance, we can give
>> up accounting stats of root memcg for MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED/FILE_DIRTY
>> /WRITEBACK
>
> I do not like this selective approach. We should handle all the stat
> types in the same way. SWAP is not a hot path but RSS and CACHE should
> be optimized as well. It seems that thresholds events might be a
> complication here but it shouldn't be that a big deal (mem_cgroup_usage
> would need some treat).
>
The three MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_{MAPPED, DIRTY, WRITEBACK} stat
are accounted in the similar way: all of them are embedded in original global
accounting routine and have mem_cgroup_update_page_stat() as the unified
accounting entry. But RSS/CACHE/SWAP are counted in memcg charging periods
and may extend the patch larger... so I just want to send this out to
collect opinion.
Now from the feedback, I think I can continue the remaining in next round.
>> and instead we pay special attention while showing root
>> memcg numbers in memcg_stat_show(): as we don't account root memcg stats
>> anymore, the root_mem_cgroup->stat numbers are actually 0.
>
> Yes, this is reasonable.
>
>> But because of hierachy, figures of root_mem_cgroup may just represent
>> numbers of pages used by its own tasks(not belonging to any other
>> child cgroup).
>
> I am not sure what the above means. root might have use_hierarchy set to
> 1 as well.
>
Yes, my fault for not clear here. What I mean is we can not simply set numbers
of root memcg to global state. Whether root.use_hierarchy is 1 or 0, the figures
of root memcg are behalf of its local page stat (the difference exists
in total_* stat).
So we can fake these root numbers out by using stats of global state and
all other memcg.
>> So here we fake these root numbers by using stats of global state and
>> all other memcg. That is for root memcg:
>> nr(MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED) = global_page_state(NR_FILE_MAPPED) -
>> sum_of_all_memcg(MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED);
>> Dirty/Writeback pages accounting are in the similar way.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@...bao.com>
>
> I like the approach but I do not like the implementation. See details
> bellow.
>
>> ---
>> mm/memcontrol.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> index fc20ac9..728349d 100644
>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> [...]
>> @@ -5396,18 +5406,70 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_lru_names_not_uptodate(void)
>> BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(mem_cgroup_lru_names) != NR_LRU_LISTS);
>> }
>>
>> +long long root_memcg_local_stat(unsigned int i, long long val,
>> + long long nstat[])
>
> Function should be static
> also
> nstat parameter is ugly because this can be done by the caller
> and also expecting that the caller already calculated val is not
> nice (and undocumented). This approach is really hackish and error
> prone. Why should we define a specific function rather than hooking into
> mem_cgroup_read_stat and doing all the stuff there? I think that would
> be much more maintainable.
>
IMHO, hooking into mem_cgroup_read_stat may be also improper because
of the for_each_mem_cgroup traversal. I prefer to make mem_cgroup_read_stat
as the base func unit. But I'll repeal the function base on your opinion in next
version. Thanks for the advice!
>> +{
>> + long long res = 0;
>> +
>> + switch (i) {
>> + case MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED:
>> + res = global_page_state(NR_FILE_MAPPED);
>> + break;
>> + case MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_DIRTY:
>> + res = global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY);
>> + break;
>> + case MEM_CGROUP_STAT_WRITEBACK:
>> + res = global_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + res = (res <= val) ? 0 : (res - val) * PAGE_SIZE;
>> + nstat[i] = res;
>> +
>> + return res;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int memcg_stat_show(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
>> struct seq_file *m)
>> {
>> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
>> struct mem_cgroup *mi;
>> unsigned int i;
>> + long long nstat[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_NSTATS] = {0};
>
> s/nstat/root_stat/
>
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < MEM_CGROUP_STAT_NSTATS; i++) {
>> + long long val = 0, res = 0;
>> +
>> if (i == MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SWAP && !do_swap_account)
>> continue;
>> - seq_printf(m, "%s %ld\n", mem_cgroup_stat_names[i],
>> - mem_cgroup_read_stat(memcg, i) * PAGE_SIZE);
>> + if (i == MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SWAP || i == MEM_CGROUP_STAT_CACHE ||
>> + i == MEM_CGROUP_STAT_RSS) {
>
> This is plain ugly. If nothing else it asks for a comment why those are
> special.
Okay, more comments will be added.
Thanks,
Sha
>
>> + seq_printf(m, "%s %ld\n", mem_cgroup_stat_names[i],
>> + mem_cgroup_read_stat(memcg, i) * PAGE_SIZE);
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* As we don't account root memcg stats anymore, the
>> + * root_mem_cgroup->stat numbers are actually 0. But because of
>> + * hierachy, figures of root_mem_cgroup may just represent
>> + * numbers of pages used by its own tasks(not belonging to any
>> + * other child cgroup). So here we fake these root numbers by
>> + * using stats of global state and all other memcg. That is for
>> + * root memcg:
>> + * nr(MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED) = global_page_state(NR_FILE_
>> + * MAPPED) - sum_of_all_memcg(MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED)
>> + * Dirty/Writeback pages accounting are in the similar way.
>> + */
>> + if (memcg == root_mem_cgroup) {
>> + for_each_mem_cgroup(mi)
>> + val += mem_cgroup_read_stat(mi, i);
>> + res = root_memcg_local_stat(i, val, nstat);
>> + } else
>> + res = mem_cgroup_read_stat(memcg, i) * PAGE_SIZE;
>> +
>> + seq_printf(m, "%s %lld\n", mem_cgroup_stat_names[i], res);
>> }
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS_NSTATS; i++)
>> @@ -5435,6 +5497,10 @@ static int memcg_stat_show(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
>> continue;
>> for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(mi, memcg)
>> val += mem_cgroup_read_stat(mi, i) * PAGE_SIZE;
>> +
>> + /* Adding local stats of root memcg */
>> + if (memcg == root_mem_cgroup)
>> + val += nstat[i];
>> seq_printf(m, "total_%s %lld\n", mem_cgroup_stat_names[i], val);
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists