[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130105172116.GA65150@digium.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 11:21:16 -0600
From: Shaun Ruffell <sruffell@...ium.com>
To: Sadasivan Shaiju <sshaiju@...sta.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, venki@...gle.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Subject: Re: Incorrect accounting of irq into the running task
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 10:22:12AM -0800, Sadasivan Shaiju wrote:
> Hi Venkatesh,
>
> I have applied the following patches for the incorrect accounting
> of irq into the running task .
>
>
> [PATCH] x86: Add IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
> [e82b8e4ea4f3dffe6e7939f90e78da675fcc450e]
> [PATCH] sched: Add IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING, finer accounting of irq time
> [b52bfee445d315549d41eacf2fa7c156e7d153d5]
>
> [PATCH] sched: Do not account irq time to current task
> [305e6835e05513406fa12820e40e4a8ecb63743c]
> [PATCH] sched: Export ns irqtimes through /proc/stat
> [abb74cefa9c682fb38ba86c17ca3c86fed6cc464]
>
>
>
> But still the stime and utime of the process in /proc/pid/stat is
> high. I think the above patches does not update The stime and
> utime values in /proc/pid/stat.
>
>
> Or am I missing anything?
Just checking that you do have CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING=y in your
kernel config?
Cheers,
Shaun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists