[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1357408144-15830-13-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 09:49:03 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu, patches@...aro.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/14] rcu: Abstract rcu_start_future_gp() from rcu_nocb_wait_gp()
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
CPUs going idle will need to record the need for a future grace
period, but won't actually need to block waiting on it. This commit
therefore splits rcu_start_future_gp(), which does the recording, from
rcu_nocb_wait_gp(), which now invokes rcu_start_future_gp() to do the
recording, after which rcu_nocb_wait_gp() does the waiting.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
kernel/rcutree.h | 2 +-
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 104 ++++------------------------------------
3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 8ca18ec..bd42feb 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ static ulong jiffies_till_next_fqs = RCU_JIFFIES_TILL_FORCE_QS;
module_param(jiffies_till_first_fqs, ulong, 0644);
module_param(jiffies_till_next_fqs, ulong, 0644);
+static void rcu_start_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp);
static void force_qs_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, int (*f)(struct rcu_data *));
static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp);
static int rcu_pending(int cpu);
@@ -1113,6 +1114,120 @@ static unsigned long rcu_cbs_completed(struct rcu_state *rsp,
}
/*
+ * Trace-event helper function for rcu_start_future_gp() and
+ * rcu_nocb_wait_gp().
+ */
+static void trace_rcu_future_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
+ unsigned long c, char *s)
+{
+ trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name, rnp->gpnum,
+ rnp->completed, c, rnp->level,
+ rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi, s);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Start some future grace period, as needed to handle newly arrived
+ * callbacks. The required future grace periods are recorded in each
+ * rcu_node structure's ->need_future_gp field.
+ *
+ * The caller must hold the specified rcu_node structure's ->lock.
+ */
+static unsigned long __maybe_unused
+rcu_start_future_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
+{
+ unsigned long c;
+ int i;
+ struct rcu_node *rnp_root = rcu_get_root(rdp->rsp);
+
+ /*
+ * Pick up grace-period number for new callbacks. If this
+ * grace period is already marked as needed, return to the caller.
+ */
+ c = rcu_cbs_completed(rdp->rsp, rnp);
+ trace_rcu_future_gp(rnp, rdp, c, "Startleaf");
+ if (rnp->need_future_gp[c & 0x1]) {
+ trace_rcu_future_gp(rnp, rdp, c, "Prestartleaf");
+ return c;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If either this rcu_node structure or the root rcu_node structure
+ * believe that a grace period is in progress, then we must wait
+ * for the one following, which is in "c". Because our request
+ * will be noticed at the end of the current grace period, we don't
+ * need to explicitly start one.
+ */
+ if (rnp->gpnum != rnp->completed ||
+ ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->gpnum) != ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->completed)) {
+ rnp->need_future_gp[c & 0x1]++;
+ trace_rcu_future_gp(rnp, rdp, c, "Startedleaf");
+ return c;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * There might be no grace period in progress. If we don't already
+ * hold it, acquire the root rcu_node structure's lock in order to
+ * start one (if needed).
+ */
+ if (rnp != rnp_root)
+ raw_spin_lock(&rnp_root->lock);
+
+ /*
+ * Get a new grace-period number. If there really is no grace
+ * period in progress, it will be smaller than the one we obtained
+ * earlier. Adjust callbacks as needed. Note that even no-CBs
+ * CPUs have a ->nxtcompleted[] array, so no no-CBs checks needed.
+ */
+ c = rcu_cbs_completed(rdp->rsp, rnp_root);
+ for (i = RCU_DONE_TAIL; i < RCU_NEXT_TAIL; i++)
+ if (ULONG_CMP_LT(c, rdp->nxtcompleted[i]))
+ rdp->nxtcompleted[i] = c;
+
+ /*
+ * If the needed for the required grace period is already
+ * recorded, trace and leave.
+ */
+ if (rnp_root->need_future_gp[c & 0x1]) {
+ trace_rcu_future_gp(rnp, rdp, c, "Prestartedroot");
+ goto unlock_out;
+ }
+
+ /* Record the need for the future grace period. */
+ rnp_root->need_future_gp[c & 0x1]++;
+
+ /* If a grace period is not already in progress, start one. */
+ if (rnp_root->gpnum != rnp_root->completed) {
+ trace_rcu_future_gp(rnp, rdp, c, "Startedleafroot");
+ } else {
+ trace_rcu_future_gp(rnp, rdp, c, "Startedroot");
+ rcu_start_gp(rdp->rsp);
+ }
+unlock_out:
+ if (rnp != rnp_root)
+ raw_spin_unlock(&rnp_root->lock);
+ return c;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Clean up any old requests for the just-ended grace period. Also return
+ * whether any additional grace periods have been requested. Also invoke
+ * rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup() in order to wake up any no-callbacks kthreads
+ * waiting for this grace period to complete.
+ */
+static int rcu_future_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+ int c = rnp->completed;
+ int needmore;
+ struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
+
+ rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(rsp, rnp);
+ rnp->need_future_gp[c & 0x1] = 0;
+ needmore = rnp->need_future_gp[(c + 1) & 0x1];
+ trace_rcu_future_gp(rnp, rdp, c, needmore ? "CleanupMore" : "Cleanup");
+ return needmore;
+}
+
+/*
* If there is room, assign a ->completed number to any callbacks on
* this CPU that have not already been assigned. Also accelerate any
* callbacks that were previously assigned a ->completed number that has
@@ -1350,9 +1465,9 @@ static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(rnp);
rnp->qsmask = rnp->qsmaskinit;
- rnp->gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
+ ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->gpnum) = rsp->gpnum;
WARN_ON_ONCE(rnp->completed != rsp->completed);
- rnp->completed = rsp->completed;
+ ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->completed) = rsp->completed;
if (rnp == rdp->mynode)
rcu_start_gp_per_cpu(rsp, rnp, rdp);
rcu_preempt_boost_start_gp(rnp);
@@ -1433,11 +1548,11 @@ static void rcu_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp)
*/
rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) {
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
- rnp->completed = rsp->gpnum;
+ ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->completed) = rsp->gpnum;
rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
if (rnp == rdp->mynode)
__rcu_process_gp_end(rsp, rnp, rdp);
- nocb += rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(rsp, rnp);
+ nocb += rcu_future_gp_cleanup(rsp, rnp);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
cond_resched();
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
index 775d96c..d6a043e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ static void zero_cpu_stall_ticks(struct rcu_data *rdp);
static void increment_cpu_stall_ticks(void);
static int rcu_nocb_needs_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp);
static void rcu_nocb_gp_set(struct rcu_node *rnp, int nrq);
-static int rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp);
+static void rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp);
static void rcu_init_one_nocb(struct rcu_node *rnp);
static bool is_nocb_cpu(int cpu);
static bool __call_rcu_nocb(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index e4037bd..71bafa8 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -2061,22 +2061,12 @@ static int rcu_nocb_needs_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp)
}
/*
- * Clean up this rcu_node structure's no-CBs state at the end of
- * a grace period, and also return whether any no-CBs CPU associated
- * with this rcu_node structure needs another grace period.
+ * Wake up any no-CBs CPUs' kthreads that were waiting on the just-ended
+ * grace period.
*/
-static int rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
+static void rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
{
- int c = rnp->completed;
- int needmore;
-
- wake_up_all(&rnp->nocb_gp_wq[c & 0x1]);
- rnp->need_future_gp[c & 0x1] = 0;
- needmore = rnp->need_future_gp[(c + 1) & 0x1];
- trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rsp->name, rnp->gpnum, rnp->completed,
- c, rnp->level, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
- needmore ? "CleanupMore" : "Cleanup");
- return needmore;
+ wake_up_all(&rnp->nocb_gp_wq[rnp->completed & 0x1]);
}
/*
@@ -2214,84 +2204,16 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
bool d;
unsigned long flags;
struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
- struct rcu_node *rnp_root = rcu_get_root(rdp->rsp);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- c = rnp->completed + 2;
-
- /* Count our request for a grace period. */
- rnp->need_future_gp[c & 0x1]++;
- trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name, rnp->gpnum,
- rnp->completed, c, rnp->level,
- rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi, "Startleaf");
-
- if (rnp->gpnum != rnp->completed) {
-
- /*
- * This rcu_node structure believes that a grace period
- * is in progress, so we are done. When this grace
- * period ends, our request will be acted upon.
- */
- trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name, rnp->gpnum,
- rnp->completed, c, rnp->level,
- rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
- "Startedleaf");
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
-
- } else {
-
- /*
- * Might not be a grace period, check root rcu_node
- * structure to see if we must start one.
- */
- if (rnp != rnp_root)
- raw_spin_lock(&rnp_root->lock); /* irqs disabled. */
- if (rnp_root->gpnum != rnp_root->completed) {
- trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name,
- rnp->gpnum,
- rnp->completed,
- c, rnp->level,
- rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
- "Startedleafroot");
- raw_spin_unlock(&rnp_root->lock); /* irqs disabled. */
- } else {
-
- /*
- * No grace period, so we need to start one.
- * The good news is that we can wait for exactly
- * one grace period instead of part of the current
- * grace period and all of the next grace period.
- * Adjust counters accordingly and start the
- * needed grace period.
- */
- rnp->need_future_gp[c & 0x1]--;
- c = rnp_root->completed + 1;
- rnp->need_future_gp[c & 0x1]++;
- rnp_root->need_future_gp[c & 0x1]++;
- trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name,
- rnp->gpnum,
- rnp->completed,
- c, rnp->level,
- rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
- "Startedroot");
- rcu_start_gp(rdp->rsp);
- raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
- }
-
- /* Clean up locking and irq state. */
- if (rnp != rnp_root)
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
- else
- local_irq_restore(flags);
- }
+ c = rcu_start_future_gp(rnp, rdp);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
/*
* Wait for the grace period. Do so interruptibly to avoid messing
* up the load average.
*/
- trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name, rnp->gpnum,
- rnp->completed, c, rnp->level,
- rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi, "StartWait");
+ trace_rcu_future_gp(rnp, rdp, c, "StartWait");
for (;;) {
wait_event_interruptible(
rnp->nocb_gp_wq[c & 0x1],
@@ -2299,14 +2221,9 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
if (likely(d))
break;
flush_signals(current);
- trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name,
- rnp->gpnum, rnp->completed, c,
- rnp->level, rnp->grplo,
- rnp->grphi, "ResumeWait");
+ trace_rcu_future_gp(rnp, rdp, c, "ResumeWait");
}
- trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name, rnp->gpnum,
- rnp->completed, c, rnp->level,
- rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi, "EndWait");
+ trace_rcu_future_gp(rnp, rdp, c, "EndWait");
smp_mb(); /* Ensure that CB invocation happens after GP end. */
}
@@ -2413,9 +2330,8 @@ static int rcu_nocb_needs_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp)
return 0;
}
-static int rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
+static void rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
{
- return 0;
}
static void rcu_nocb_gp_set(struct rcu_node *rnp, int nrq)
--
1.7.8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists