lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130105221115.GC1246@lizard.mcd00620.sjc.wayport.net>
Date:	Sat, 5 Jan 2013 14:11:15 -0800
From:	Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Donggeun Kim <dg77.kim@...sung.com>,
	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/25] charger_manager: don't use [delayed_]work_pending()

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 05:56:51PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> There's no need to test whether a (delayed) work item in pending
> before queueing, flushing or cancelling it.  Most uses are unnecessary
> and quite a few of them are buggy.
> 
> Remove unnecessary pending tests and rewrite _setup_polling() so that
> it uses mod_delayed_work() if the next polling interval is sooner than
> currently scheduled.  queue_delayed_work() is used otherwise.
> 
> Only compile tested.  I noticed that two work items - setup_polling
> and cm_monitor_work - schedule each other.  It's a very unusual
> construct and I'm fairly sure it's racy.  You can't break such
> circular dependency by calling cancel on each.  I strongly recommend
> revising the mechanism.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...l.ru>
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
> Cc: Donggeun Kim <dg77.kim@...sung.com>
> Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
> ---
> Please let me know how this patch should be routed.  I can take it
> through the workqueue tree if necessary.

Charger manager is a fast moving target, so it is prone to conflict; it is
better if I take it via battery-2.6.git tree. It is merged, thanks a lot!

Anton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ