lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH9NwWfzY1+215jfr5XKEOfrpyJse_2sWOny=K3vQ3Z2VGxchg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 6 Jan 2013 19:12:14 +0100
From:	Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@...il.com>
To:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask

ping
--
Christian Gmeiner, MSc


2012/12/17 Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@...il.com>:
> 2012/12/13 Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@...il.com>:
>>> During the development of this driver an in-house register
>>> documentation was used. The last weeks some integration tests
>>> were done and this problem was found. It turned out that
>>> the released register documentation is wrong.
>>>
>>> The fix is very simple: shift all masks by one.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c |   14 +++++++-------
>>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c b/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c
>>> index c464682..676e729 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c
>>> @@ -47,37 +47,37 @@ static struct ot200_led leds[] = {
>>>         {
>>>                 .name = "led_1",
>>>                 .port = 0x49,
>>> -               .mask = BIT(7),
>>> +               .mask = BIT(6),
>>>         },
>>>         {
>>>                 .name = "led_2",
>>>                 .port = 0x49,
>>> -               .mask = BIT(6),
>>> +               .mask = BIT(5),
>>>         },
>>>         {
>>>                 .name = "led_3",
>>>                 .port = 0x49,
>>> -               .mask = BIT(5),
>>> +               .mask = BIT(4),
>>>         },
>>>         {
>>>                 .name = "led_4",
>>>                 .port = 0x49,
>>> -               .mask = BIT(4),
>>> +               .mask = BIT(3),
>>>         },
>>>         {
>>>                 .name = "led_5",
>>>                 .port = 0x49,
>>> -               .mask = BIT(3),
>>> +               .mask = BIT(2),
>>>         },
>>>         {
>>>                 .name = "led_6",
>>>                 .port = 0x49,
>>> -               .mask = BIT(2),
>>> +               .mask = BIT(1),
>>>         },
>>>         {
>>>                 .name = "led_7",
>>>                 .port = 0x49,
>>> -               .mask = BIT(1),
>>> +               .mask = BIT(0),
>>>         }
>>>  };
>>>
>>> --
>>> 1.7.10.4
>>>
>>
>> Is something missing to get this patch merged?
>> --
>> Christian Gmeiner, MSc
>
>
> ping
> --
> Christian Gmeiner, MSc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ