[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20713.61807.385486.594545@quad.stoffel.home>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 16:49:35 -0500
From: "John Stoffel" <john@...ffel.org>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Major network performance regression in 3.7
>>>>> "Willy" == Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> writes:
Willy> On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 11:00:15AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 10:51 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> > >
>> > > (sd->len is usually 4096, which is expected, but sd->total_len value is
>> > > huge in your case, so we always set the flag in fs/splice.c)
>> >
>> > I am testing :
>> >
>> > if (sd->len < sd->total_len && pipe->nrbufs > 1)
>> > more |= MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST;
>> >
>>
>> Yes, this should fix the problem :
>>
>> If there is no following buffer in the pipe, we should not set NOTLAST.
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/splice.c b/fs/splice.c
>> index 8890604..6909d89 100644
>> --- a/fs/splice.c
>> +++ b/fs/splice.c
>> @@ -696,8 +696,10 @@ static int pipe_to_sendpage(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> more = (sd->flags & SPLICE_F_MORE) ? MSG_MORE : 0;
>> - if (sd->len < sd->total_len)
>> +
>> + if (sd->len < sd->total_len && pipe->nrbufs > 1)
>> more |= MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST;
>> +
>> return file->f_op->sendpage(file, buf->page, buf->offset,
sd-> len, &pos, more);
>> }
Willy> OK it works like a charm here now ! I can't break it anymore, so it
Willy> looks like you finally got it !
It's still broken, there's no comments in the code to explain all this
magic to mere mortals! *grin*
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists