[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1TryU3-0001K5-Iy@jdl.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 16:14:23 -0600
From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@....com>
To: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>
cc: David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
Matt Porter <mporter@...com>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@...com>
Subject: Re: Fix test relying in wrong behavior of is_printable
> Hi David
>
> =CE=91=CF=80=CF=8C =CF=84=CE=BF iPhone =CE=BC=CE=BF=CF=85
>
> 6 =CE=99=CE=B1=CE=BD 2013, 5:58, =CE=BF/=CE=B7 David Gibson <david@...son.dr=
> opbear.id.au> =CE=AD=CE=B3=CF=81=CE=B1=CF=88=CE=B5:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:16:08PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >> After fixing the is_printable bug the test suite fails.
> >> Fix it with this patch
> >>=20
> >> Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>
> >=20
> > Rather than just removing the test, it would be better to still run it
> > using an explicit -t bi to force the byte output.
>
> Perhaps it wasn't exactly clear in the patch. The old test case output is co=
> mmented out but there is test case output for the new patch.=20
>
> So the test is not removed.=20
Uh, yeah, something needs to be done here still.
(There is a failing test still.)
Could we get a resubmission of the fix, please?
Thanks,
jdl
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists