[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1357457724.1678.5941.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:35:24 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Major network performance regression in 3.7
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 03:52 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> OK so I observed no change with this patch, either on the loopback
> data rate at >16kB MTU, or on the myri. I'm keeping it at hand for
> experimentation anyway.
>
Yeah, there was no bug. I rewrote it for net-next as a cleanup/optim
only.
> Concerning the loopback MTU, I find it strange that the MTU changes
> the splice() behaviour and not send/recv. I thought that there could
> be a relation between the MTU and the pipe size, but it does not
> appear to be the case either, as I tried various sizes between 16kB
> and 256kB without achieving original performance.
It probably is related to a too small receive window, given the MTU was
multiplied by 4, I guess we need to make some adjustments
You also could try :
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 1ca2536..b68cdfb 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -1482,6 +1482,9 @@ int tcp_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
break;
}
used = recv_actor(desc, skb, offset, len);
+ /* Clean up data we have read: This will do ACK frames. */
+ if (used > 0)
+ tcp_cleanup_rbuf(sk, used);
if (used < 0) {
if (!copied)
copied = used;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists