linux-kernel - Re: Major network performance regression in 3.7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1357484342.6919.61.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Sun, 06 Jan 2013 06:59:02 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Major network performance regression in 3.7

On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 10:24 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:

> It does not change anything to the tests above unfortunately. It did not
> even stabilize the unstable runs.
> 
> I'll check if I can spot the original commit which caused the regression
> for MTUs that are not n*4096+52.

Since you don't post your program, I wont be able to help, just by
guessing what it does...

TCP has very low defaults concerning initial window, and it appears you
set RCVBUF to even smaller values.

Here we can see "win 8030", this is not a sane value...

18:32:08.071602 IP 127.0.0.1.26792 > 127.0.0.1.8000: S 2036886615:2036886615(0) win 8030 <mss 65495,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 9>
18:32:08.071605 IP 127.0.0.1.8000 > 127.0.0.1.26792: S 126397113:126397113(0) ack 2036886616 win 8030 <mss 65495,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 9>

So you apparently changed /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_rmem or SO_RCVBUF ?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/