| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130107081821.GF27909@elie.Belkin> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 00:18:21 -0800 From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com> To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com> Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@...19freenet.de>, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@...glemail.com>, "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com> Subject: Re: [ 104/173] rt2x00: Dont let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDU subframe fails Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 01:42:37PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> To be clear, I have all of these in the queue: >> >> be03d4a45c09 rt2x00: Don't let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDU subframe fails >> 5b632fe85ec8 mac80211: introduce IEEE80211_HW_TEARDOWN_AGGR_ON_BAR_FAIL >> ab9d6e4ffe19 Revert: "rt2x00: Don't let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDU subframe fails" >> >> and I'm intending to drop/defer them all. > > Patch 3 is a revert of patch 1 (questioned patch). Please apply all 3 patches, > or only patch 2. Despite its title, isn't patch 3 not exactly a revert? It includes a change that depends on patch 2. I don't think patch 2 alone would have any effect. Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists