[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130107121347.GG26066@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:13:47 +0200
From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
To: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>
CC: "swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"mturquette@...aro.org" <mturquette@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] clk: tegra: Add tegra specific clocks
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 03:47:14PM +0100, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> Add tegra specific clocks, pll, pll_out, peripheral,
> frac_divider, super.
>
...
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll-out.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll-out.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..60a117b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll-out.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2012, NVIDIA CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
> + * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
> + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
> + * more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +
> +#include "clk.h"
> +
> +#define to_clk_pll_out(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct tegra_clk_pll_out, hw)
> +
> +#define pll_out_enb(p) (BIT(p->enb_bit_idx))
> +#define pll_out_rst(p) (BIT(p->rst_bit_idx))
> +
Given that these 2 are always consecutive bits, wouldn't it make more sense to
specify the bit offset once and then add 1 for the enable bit?
Cheers,
Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists