[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1357568256.26822.18.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 14:17:36 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Cc: Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@...19freenet.de>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@...glemail.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [ 104/173] rt2x00: Dont let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDU
subframe fails
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 09:10 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:05:32AM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > > To be clear, I have all of these in the queue:
> > >
> > > be03d4a45c09 rt2x00: Don't let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDU subframe fails
> > > 5b632fe85ec8 mac80211: introduce IEEE80211_HW_TEARDOWN_AGGR_ON_BAR_FAIL
> > > ab9d6e4ffe19 Revert: "rt2x00: Don't let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDU subframe fails"
> > >
> > > and I'm intending to drop/defer them all.
> >
> > Patch 3 is a revert of patch 1 (questioned patch). Please apply all 3 patches,
> > or only patch 2.
>
> No, actually all 3 patches have to be applied. Because last one, except
> revert, include flag IEEE80211_HW_TEARDOWN_AGGR_ON_BAR_FAIL setting in rt2x00
> driver, which make patch 2 work.
Andreas said that that after ab9d6e4ffe19 there was still a regression.
But maybe he was confused. I know I'm confused.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
If you seem to know what you are doing, you'll be given more to do.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists