linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] virtio: add functions for piecewise addition of buffers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:27:46 +0100
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC:	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com,
	hutao@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, stefanha@...hat.com,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] virtio: add functions for piecewise addition of
 buffers

Il 07/01/2013 01:02, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> writes:
>> Il 02/01/2013 06:03, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
>>> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> writes:
>>>> The virtqueue_add_buf function has two limitations:
>>>>
>>>> 1) it requires the caller to provide all the buffers in a single call;
>>>>
>>>> 2) it does not support chained scatterlists: the buffers must be
>>>> provided as an array of struct scatterlist;
>>>
>>> Chained scatterlists are a horrible interface, but that doesn't mean we
>>> shouldn't support them if there's a need.
>>>
>>> I think I once even had a patch which passed two chained sgs, rather
>>> than a combo sg and two length numbers.  It's very old, but I've pasted
>>> it below.
>>>
>>> Duplicating the implementation by having another interface is pretty
>>> nasty; I think I'd prefer the chained scatterlists, if that's optimal
>>> for you.
>>
>> Unfortunately, that cannot work because not all architectures support
>> chained scatterlists.
> 
> WHAT?  I can't figure out what an arch needs to do to support this?

It needs to use the iterator functions in its DMA driver.

> All archs we care about support them, though, so I think we can ignore
> this issue for now.

Kind of... In principle all QEMU-supported arches can use virtio, and
the speedup can be quite useful.  And there is no Kconfig symbol for SG
chains that I can use to disable virtio-scsi on unsupported arches. :/

Paolo

>> (Also, as you mention chained scatterlists are horrible.  They'd happen
>> to work for virtio-scsi, but not for virtio-blk where the response
>> status is part of the footer, not the header).
> 
> We lost that debate 5 years ago, so we hack around it as needed.  We can
> add helpers to append if we need.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/