[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130107155132.GB11145@leaf>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 07:51:33 -0800
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu, patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/6] RCU fixes for 3.9
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:19:16AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:09:20AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > The following fixes are intended for 3.9:
> >
> > 1. Fix int/long type confusion in trace_rcu_start_batch().
> > 2. Declare rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle() static, courtesy of
> > Josh Triplett.
> > 3. Make rcu_eqs_enter_common() trace the new nesting value instead
> > of zero, courtesy of Li Zhong.
> > 4. Silence a gcc array-out-of-bounds false positive in rcu_init_one().
> > 5. Code style fix in rcu_torture_barrier_init(), courtesy of Sasha Levin.
>
> and:
>
> 6. Grammar fix to rcu_scheduler_active comment, courtesy of Cody
> Schafer.
One comment on patch 4/6, but in any case,
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
for the whole series.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists