linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: eliminate unneeded for_each

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <82A31E2D-FA24-44CF-9812-9E8062AFA6F4@kernel.crashing.org>
Date:	Mon, 7 Jan 2013 10:42:02 -0600
From:	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: eliminate unneeded for_each_memblock


On Jan 4, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Cody P Schafer wrote:

> The only persistent change made by this loop is calling
> memblock_set_node() once for each memblock, which is not useful (and has
> no effect) as memblock_set_node() is not called with any
> memblock-specific parameters.
> 
> Subsistute a single memblock_set_node().
> ---
> arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 9 ++-------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Missing a signed-off-by

- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/