[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQVH8p1-gotohCrneVtJQhn_cAMc--LWsFEhjqb1zFEKow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 13:30:22 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7u1 26/31] x86: Don't enable swiotlb if there is not
enough ram for it
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>> 2). The check for 1MB is suspect. Why only 1MB? You mentioned it is
>> b/c of crashkernel_low=72M (which I am not seeing in v3.8 kernel-parameters.txt?
>> Is that part of your mega-patchset?). Anyhow, there seems to be a disconnect -
>> what if the user supplied crashkernel_low=27M? Perhaps the 'is_enough'
>> should also parse the bootparams to double-check that there is enough
>> low-mem space? But then if the kernel grows then 72M might not be enough -
>> you might need 82M with 3.9.
>
> again, could with memmap= include or exclude case, so parse boot command line
> is not going to handle all the case.
replace the hardcoded 1M checking, please check attached -v3.
Thanks
Yinghai
Download attachment "auto_switch_off_swiotlb_v3.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (5014 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists