[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFTL4hwffymjAstKHB4S238goaNMpW_0hO74nFBKGrP1J6rs7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 22:34:28 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] context_tracking: Add comments on interface and internals
2012/12/16 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>:
>
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * context_tracking_task_switch - context switch the syscall hooks
>> + *
>> + * The context tracking uses the syscall slow path to implement its user-kernel
>> + * boundaries hooks on syscalls. This way it doesn't impact the syscall fast
>> + * path on CPUs that don't do context tracking.
>> + *
>> + * But we need to clear the flag on the previous task because it may later
>> + * migrate to some CPU that doesn't do the context tracking. As such the TIF
>> + * flag may not be desired there.
>
> If possible: s/hooks/callbacks
>
> 'hook' gives me the visual of a box match. YMMV.
Ok, I'm fixing this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists