| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <50EBBE54.1040007@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 14:36:04 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
CC: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/5] KVM: MMU: fix Dirty bit missed if CR0.WP = 0
If the write-fault access is from supervisor and CR0.WP is not set on the
vcpu, kvm will fix it by adjusting pte access - it sets the W bit on pte
and clears U bit. This is the chance that kvm can change pte access from
readonly to writable
Unfortunately, the pte access is the access of 'direct' shadow page table,
means direct sp.role.access = pte_access, then we will create a writable
spte entry on the readonly shadow page table. It will cause Dirty bit is
not tracked when two guest ptes point to the same large page. Note, it
does not have other impact except Dirty bit since cr0.wp is encoded into
sp.role
It can be fixed by adjusting pte access before establishing shadow page
table. Also, after that, no mmu specified code exists in the common function
and drop two parameters in set_spte
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 47 ++++++++++++-------------------------------
arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 01d7c2a..2a3c890 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -2342,8 +2342,7 @@ static int mmu_need_write_protect(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
}
static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
- unsigned pte_access, int user_fault,
- int write_fault, int level,
+ unsigned pte_access, int level,
gfn_t gfn, pfn_t pfn, bool speculative,
bool can_unsync, bool host_writable)
{
@@ -2378,9 +2377,7 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
spte |= (u64)pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
- if ((pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK)
- || (!vcpu->arch.mmu.direct_map && write_fault
- && !is_write_protection(vcpu) && !user_fault)) {
+ if (pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK) {
/*
* There are two cases:
@@ -2399,19 +2396,6 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
spte |= PT_WRITABLE_MASK | SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE;
- if (!vcpu->arch.mmu.direct_map
- && !(pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK)) {
- spte &= ~PT_USER_MASK;
- /*
- * If we converted a user page to a kernel page,
- * so that the kernel can write to it when cr0.wp=0,
- * then we should prevent the kernel from executing it
- * if SMEP is enabled.
- */
- if (kvm_read_cr4_bits(vcpu, X86_CR4_SMEP))
- spte |= PT64_NX_MASK;
- }
-
/*
* Optimization: for pte sync, if spte was writable the hash
* lookup is unnecessary (and expensive). Write protection
@@ -2442,18 +2426,15 @@ done:
static void mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
unsigned pt_access, unsigned pte_access,
- int user_fault, int write_fault,
- int *emulate, int level, gfn_t gfn,
- pfn_t pfn, bool speculative,
- bool host_writable)
+ int write_fault, int *emulate, int level, gfn_t gfn,
+ pfn_t pfn, bool speculative, bool host_writable)
{
int was_rmapped = 0;
int rmap_count;
- pgprintk("%s: spte %llx access %x write_fault %d"
- " user_fault %d gfn %llx\n",
+ pgprintk("%s: spte %llx access %x write_fault %d gfn %llx\n",
__func__, *sptep, pt_access,
- write_fault, user_fault, gfn);
+ write_fault, gfn);
if (is_rmap_spte(*sptep)) {
/*
@@ -2477,9 +2458,8 @@ static void mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
was_rmapped = 1;
}
- if (set_spte(vcpu, sptep, pte_access, user_fault, write_fault,
- level, gfn, pfn, speculative, true,
- host_writable)) {
+ if (set_spte(vcpu, sptep, pte_access, level, gfn, pfn, speculative,
+ true, host_writable)) {
if (write_fault)
*emulate = 1;
kvm_mmu_flush_tlb(vcpu);
@@ -2571,10 +2551,9 @@ static int direct_pte_prefetch_many(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return -1;
for (i = 0; i < ret; i++, gfn++, start++)
- mmu_set_spte(vcpu, start, ACC_ALL,
- access, 0, 0, NULL,
- sp->role.level, gfn,
- page_to_pfn(pages[i]), true, true);
+ mmu_set_spte(vcpu, start, ACC_ALL, access, 0, NULL,
+ sp->role.level, gfn, page_to_pfn(pages[i]),
+ true, true);
return 0;
}
@@ -2636,8 +2615,8 @@ static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t v, int write,
unsigned pte_access = ACC_ALL;
mmu_set_spte(vcpu, iterator.sptep, ACC_ALL, pte_access,
- 0, write, &emulate,
- level, gfn, pfn, prefault, map_writable);
+ write, &emulate, level, gfn, pfn,
+ prefault, map_writable);
direct_pte_prefetch(vcpu, iterator.sptep);
++vcpu->stat.pf_fixed;
break;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
index a7b24cf..7c575e7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ FNAME(prefetch_gpte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
* we call mmu_set_spte() with host_writable = true because
* pte_prefetch_gfn_to_pfn always gets a writable pfn.
*/
- mmu_set_spte(vcpu, spte, sp->role.access, pte_access, 0, 0,
+ mmu_set_spte(vcpu, spte, sp->role.access, pte_access, 0,
NULL, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL, gfn, pfn, true, true);
return true;
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static void FNAME(pte_prefetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct guest_walker *gw,
*/
static int FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
struct guest_walker *gw,
- int user_fault, int write_fault, int hlevel,
+ int write_fault, int hlevel,
pfn_t pfn, bool map_writable, bool prefault)
{
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = NULL;
@@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ static int FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
clear_sp_write_flooding_count(it.sptep);
mmu_set_spte(vcpu, it.sptep, access, gw->pte_access,
- user_fault, write_fault, &emulate, it.level,
+ write_fault, &emulate, it.level,
gw->gfn, pfn, prefault, map_writable);
FNAME(pte_prefetch)(vcpu, gw, it.sptep);
@@ -560,6 +560,26 @@ static int FNAME(page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr, u32 error_code,
walker.gfn, pfn, walker.pte_access, &r))
return r;
+ /*
+ * Do not change pte_access if the pfn is a mmio page, otherwise
+ * we will cache the incorrect access into mmio spte.
+ */
+ if (write_fault && !(walker.pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK) &&
+ !is_write_protection(vcpu) && !user_fault &&
+ !is_noslot_pfn(pfn)) {
+ walker.pte_access |= ACC_WRITE_MASK;
+ walker.pte_access &= ~ACC_USER_MASK;
+
+ /*
+ * If we converted a user page to a kernel page,
+ * so that the kernel can write to it when cr0.wp=0,
+ * then we should prevent the kernel from executing it
+ * if SMEP is enabled.
+ */
+ if (kvm_read_cr4_bits(vcpu, X86_CR4_SMEP))
+ walker.pte_access &= ~ACC_EXEC_MASK;
+ }
+
spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
if (mmu_notifier_retry(vcpu->kvm, mmu_seq))
goto out_unlock;
@@ -568,7 +588,7 @@ static int FNAME(page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr, u32 error_code,
kvm_mmu_free_some_pages(vcpu);
if (!force_pt_level)
transparent_hugepage_adjust(vcpu, &walker.gfn, &pfn, &level);
- r = FNAME(fetch)(vcpu, addr, &walker, user_fault, write_fault,
+ r = FNAME(fetch)(vcpu, addr, &walker, write_fault,
level, pfn, map_writable, prefault);
++vcpu->stat.pf_fixed;
kvm_mmu_audit(vcpu, AUDIT_POST_PAGE_FAULT);
@@ -743,7 +763,7 @@ static int FNAME(sync_page)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
host_writable = sp->spt[i] & SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE;
- set_spte(vcpu, &sp->spt[i], pte_access, 0, 0,
+ set_spte(vcpu, &sp->spt[i], pte_access,
PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL, gfn,
spte_to_pfn(sp->spt[i]), true, false,
host_writable);
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists