[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50EBCC93.5000203@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 15:36:51 +0800
From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@...il.com>,
Shane Huang <shane.huang@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] block: implement runtime pm strategy
On 01/08/2013 01:21 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
>
>> From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
>>
>> When a request is added:
>> If device is suspended or is suspending and the request is not a
>> PM request, resume the device.
>>
>> When the last request finishes:
>> Call pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() and pm_runtime_autosuspend().
>>
>> When pick a request:
>> If device is resuming/suspending, then only PM request is allowed to go.
>> Return NULL for other cases.
>>
>> [aaron.lu@...el.com: PM request does not involve nr_pending counting]
>> [aaron.lu@...el.com: No need to check q->dev]
>> [aaron.lu@...el.com: Autosuspend when the last request finished]
>> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
>
>> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
>> @@ -974,6 +974,40 @@ extern int blk_pre_runtime_suspend(struct request_queue *q);
>> extern void blk_post_runtime_suspend(struct request_queue *q, int err);
>> extern void blk_pre_runtime_resume(struct request_queue *q);
>> extern void blk_post_runtime_resume(struct request_queue *q, int err);
>> +
>> +static inline void blk_pm_put_request(struct request *rq)
>> +{
>> + if (!(rq->cmd_flags & REQ_PM) && !--rq->q->nr_pending) {
>> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(rq->q->dev);
>> + pm_runtime_autosuspend(rq->q->dev);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline struct request *blk_pm_peek_request(
>> + struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
>> +{
>> + if (q->rpm_status == RPM_SUSPENDED ||
>> + (q->rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE && !(rq->cmd_flags & REQ_PM)))
>> + return NULL;
>> + else
>> + return rq;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void blk_pm_requeue_request(struct request *rq)
>> +{
>> + if (!(rq->cmd_flags & REQ_PM))
>> + rq->q->nr_pending--;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void blk_pm_add_request(struct request_queue *q,
>> + struct request *rq)
>> +{
>> + if (!(rq->cmd_flags & REQ_PM) &&
>> + q->nr_pending++ == 0 &&
>> + (q->rpm_status == RPM_SUSPENDED ||
>> + q->rpm_status == RPM_SUSPENDING))
>> + pm_request_resume(q->dev);
>> +}
>
> These routines also don't belong in include/linux. And they don't need
> to be marked inline.
OK, will move them.
What about create a new file blk-pm.c for all these block pm related
code?
Thanks,
Aaron
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists