[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130108081930.GC19691@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 00:19:31 -0800
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree
(dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 02:43:08PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 09:35:57AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Vinod,
> >
> > In commit 548860697046 ("dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree
> > support") (which was changed since yesterday :-(), an instance of
> > __devinit has been added. We are in the process of making CONFIG_HOTPLUG
> > always true, and since commit 78d86c213f28 ("init.h: Remove __dev*
> > sections from the kernel") (included in v3.7), __devinit does nothing.
> > Please do not add any more.
>
> That brings up something I wanted to ask you.
>
> I'd like to send a patch to Linus to just delete __devinit and friends
> entirely from init.h, but that will break the linux-next tree from
> building in places (like this one, and in a few others.)
>
> Is that ok? That should finally get everyone's attention and keep them
> from the cargo-cult programming mode of using these attributes :)
I think if you remove this from linus's tree and since we are in rc2 we can get
it done and remove all other intances from other trees.
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists