[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFTL4hymZ9GqC+XEec0WGJij99jc_K3pdQZ48t0eKU45PzQEJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 02:55:12 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Remove broken check for skip clock update
2013/1/8 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>:
> On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 02:07 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> rq->skip_clock_update shouldn't be negative. Thus the check
>> in put_prev_task() is useless.
>>
>> It was probably intended to do the following check:
>>
>> if (prev->on_rq && !rq->skip_clock_update)
>>
>> We only want to update the clock if the current task is
>> not voluntarily sleeping: otherwise deactivate_task()
>> already did the rq clock update in schedule(). But we want
>> to ignore that update if a ttwu did it for us, in which case
>> rq->skip_clock_update is 1.
>>
>> But update_rq_clock() already takes care of that so we
>> can just remove the broken condition.
>
> kernel/sched/rt.c:
>
> /*
> * Force a clock update if the CPU was idle,
> * lest wakeup -> unthrottle time accumulate.
> */
> if (rt_rq->rt_nr_running && rq->curr == rq->idle)
> rq->skip_clock_update = -1;
Grr, I knew I was missing something!
Ok let's drop that patch then.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists