[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130108155114.GC29635@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:51:14 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: lizefan@...wei.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ctalbott@...gle.com, rni@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/24] cfq-iosched: implement cfq_group->nr_active and
->children_weight
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:35:34PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> To prepare for blkcg hierarchy support, add cfqg->nr_active and
> ->children_weight. cfqg->nr_active counts the number of active cfqgs
> at the cfqg's level and ->children_weight is sum of weights of those
> cfqgs. The level covers itself (cfqg->leaf_weight) and immediate
> children.
>
> The two values are updated when a cfqg enters and leaves the group
> service tree. Unless the hierarchy is very deep, the added overhead
> should be negligible.
>
> Currently, the parent is determined using cfqg_flat_parent() which
> makes the root cfqg the parent of all other cfqgs. This is to make
> the transition to hierarchy-aware scheduling gradual. Scheduling
> logic will be converted to use cfqg->children_weight without actually
> changing the behavior. When everything is ready,
> blkcg_weight_parent() will be replaced with proper parent function.
>
> This patch doesn't introduce any behavior chagne.
>
> v2: s/cfqg->level_weight/cfqg->children_weight/ as per Vivek.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists