[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130108160321.GC12363@hansolo.jdub.homelinux.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 11:03:22 -0500
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
mdharm-usb@...-eyed-alien.net, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: USB autosuspend vs. URB submission
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:51:20AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2013, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We've had a few reports in Fedora of users hitting the WARN_ONCE in
> > drivers/usb/core/urb.c that prints a warning about a usb_submit_urb
> > being called on an active URB. One of them[1] is from the ums_realtek
> > driver and the other[2] is from the uvcvideo driver. However, I noticed
> > that in both instances it seems the devices were coming back from what I
> > think is autosuspend.
> >
> > I didn't immediately find any similar reports, and to my rather
> > inexperienced eyes the drivers didn't seem to be doing anything clearly
> > wrong. I'm wondering if anyone has some possible ideas for debugging
> > and whether or not this might be a general issue?
>
> I don't see anything wrong either.
>
> Can you ask the users to collect a usbmon trace covering the period
> when the problem occurs?
I'll certainly ask. I'm not particularly hopeful for great results
though, as the problems seem to be rather intermittent.
Thanks for taking a look.
josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists