[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50ED0517.5090907@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 11:20:15 +0530
From: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@...aro.org>
To: Rajagopal Venkat <rajagopal.venkat@...aro.org>
CC: mturquette@...aro.org, patches@...aro.org,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: remove unreachable code
On 01/08/2013 06:33 PM, Rajagopal Venkat wrote:
> while reparenting a clock, NULL check is done for clock in
> consideration and its new parent. So re-check is not required.
> If done, else part becomes unreachable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajagopal Venkat <rajagopal.venkat@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index 251e45d..f896584 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -1048,10 +1048,7 @@ void __clk_reparent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *new_parent)
>
> hlist_del(&clk->child_node);
>
> - if (new_parent)
> - hlist_add_head(&clk->child_node, &new_parent->children);
> - else
> - hlist_add_head(&clk->child_node, &clk_orphan_list);
> + hlist_add_head(&clk->child_node, &new_parent->children);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DEBUG
> if (!inited)
>
The same logic holds good for following piece of code too.
1060 |-------if (new_parent)
1061 |-------|-------new_parent_d = new_parent->dentry;
1062 |-------else
1063 |-------|-------new_parent_d = orphandir;
--
Tushar Behera
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists