[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871udurdk8.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 17:00:23 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Get rid of unnecessary checks from select_idle_sibling
On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:38:11 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>>
>> Uh, we don't know if the target is this_cpu or previous cpu, If we just
>> check the target idle status, we may miss another idle cpu. So this
>> patch change the logical in this function.
>
> But, you can fold wake_affine into select_idle_sibling(). that will save
> a complicate calculation whichever cpu idle. :)
Looks like a good idea. :) Will send v2.
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists