[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQVomDtc0P9B7aTDBrm7kC+i=GYokBmT54w-VBwZsafb5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 17:12:02 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7u1 26/31] x86: Don't enable swiotlb if there is not
enough ram for it
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> So instead we need to say?
>>
>> + if (no_iotlb_memory)
>> + panic("Cannot allocate SWIOTLB buffer");
>> +
>>
>> Which is just making the panic a little later than it used to be and
>> seems completely reasonable.
>
> yes, looks some driver just use map_single without checking results.
update one.
later could have another patch to shrink size...
Download attachment "swiotlb.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (5346 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists