[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <470C14E4-2866-4C55-89A3-D6751E1587C4@ipflavors.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:36:40 +0100
From: Romain KUNTZ <r.kuntz@...lavors.com>
To: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andreas Hofmeister <andi@...lax.com>,
Romain KUNTZ <r.kuntz@...lavors.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ipv6: fix the noflags test in addrconf_get_prefix_route
>From e7ece201c35615c44a3cfdc10ee28ad5a5878f41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Romain Kuntz <r.kuntz@...lavors.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:02:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ipv6: fix the noflags test in addrconf_get_prefix_route
The tests on the flags in addrconf_get_prefix_route() does no make
much sense: the 'noflags' parameter contains the set of flags that
must not match with the route flags, so the test must be done
against 'noflags', and not against 'flags'.
Signed-off-by: Romain Kuntz <r.kuntz@...lavors.com>
---
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 408cac4a..29ba4ff 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -1877,7 +1877,7 @@ static struct rt6_info *addrconf_get_prefix_route(const struct in6_addr *pfx,
continue;
if ((rt->rt6i_flags & flags) != flags)
continue;
- if ((noflags != 0) && ((rt->rt6i_flags & flags) != 0))
+ if ((rt->rt6i_flags & noflags) != 0)
continue;
dst_hold(&rt->dst);
break;
--
1.7.2.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists