linux-kernel - Re: [resend][PATCH 03/16] dmaengine: introduce is_slave

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Jan 2013 07:10:01 -0800
From:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.jf.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, spear-devel <spear-devel@...t.st.com>
Subject: Re: [resend][PATCH 03/16] dmaengine: introduce is_slave_xfer
 function

On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:58:02PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> > n 9 January 2013 19:20, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> wrote:
> >>> +static inline bool is_slave_xfer(enum dma_transfer_direction direction)
> >>> +{
> >>> +     return (direction == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) || (direction == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
> >>> +}
> >> After reading the subsequent patch I understand what is intent here. Perhaps
> >> is_slave_dirn() would have been a beter one...
> >
> > dirn isn't readable, it took me some time to understand the intent...
> > Either have xfer or direction :)
> 
> Agree with Viresh. I might rename it to is_slave_direction if you want to.
direction sounds fine too.

--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/