[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQWm6=1JXA7EB-a0aqgTFQ5ZeCxz_gAU+ABUce1Ovn1Siw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 11:01:39 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@...panasonic.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for
hot-add root bus
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
>> the reason why we need to change those codes for x86, we want to make it support
>> pci root bus hotplug. So it would be reasonable for us to align other
>> platform to x86
>> changes after pci root bus hotplug change is completely done.
>
> OK, I opened https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52531 as a
> way to keep track of this consistency issue and merged
> pci/yinghai-survey-resources to my -next branch.
Thanks a lot. will send other pci root bus hotplug out.
question: now Rafael's tree has acpi-scan branch and it touches pci-root.c.
so is it ok for me to base patches on your pci/next and his pm/acpi-scan?
how?
can you two have some arrangement like you pulling Rafael's branch?
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists