[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130109201510.416785675@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:35:31 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [ 092/123] signals: sys_ssetmask() uses uninitialized newmask
3.7-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
commit 5ba53ff648e785445a32ba39112ed07e4cf588d0 upstream.
Commit 77097ae503b1 ("most of set_current_blocked() callers want
SIGKILL/SIGSTOP removed from set") removed the initialization of newmask
by accident, causing ltp to complain like this:
ssetmask01 1 TFAIL : sgetmask() failed: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
Restore the proper initialization.
Reported-and-tested-by: CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/signal.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -3221,6 +3221,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(ssetmask, int, newmask)
int old = current->blocked.sig[0];
sigset_t newset;
+ siginitset(&newset, newmask);
set_current_blocked(&newset);
return old;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists